Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Barnaby and Wolfe, Inc. v. Rankin et al
as 4:2014cv00492
Plaintiff:
Barnaby and Wolfe, Inc.
Defendant:
Barry Rankin and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Wilson Law Firm, PC v. H. Hollis Rankin, III et al
as 7:2014mc00894
Plaintiff:
The Wilson Law Firm, PC
Defendant:
H. Hollis Rankin, III et al
Hirschy et al v. Saloner
as 3:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hirschy , Thomas Cass Andrews , Hirschy & Sons Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Alan Saloner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aguilar et al v. Turner Industries Group LLC
as 1:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Aguilar , All Plaintiffs , James Louis Bowen and others
Defendant:
Turner Industries Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanchez et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 7:2013cv00485
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Robert Rankin
Plaintiff:
Mario Sanchez and Elizabeth Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khademi et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 7:2013cv00483
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds , Eduardo Weigard , Ronald Rankin and others
Plaintiff:
Kambiz Khademi and Roya Khademi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vasquez et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co
as 5:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Vasquez and Rosario Rankin
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
The Wilson Law Firm, P.C. v. Rankin
as 7:2012mc00219
Plaintiff:
The Wilson Law Firm, P.C.
Defendant:
H. Hollis Rankin, III and CVI Company, LTD
The Wilson Law Firm, P.C. v. Rankin
as 7:2012mc00218
Plaintiff:
The Wilson Law Firm, P.C.
Defendant:
H. Hollis Rankin, III and Matthew Campbell
Rankin Construction Inc v. Prestige Products, LLC
as 3:2011cv00880
Defendant:
Prestige Products LLC
Plaintiff:
Rankin Construction Inc
Counter_claimant:
Prestige Products LLC
Counter_defendant:
Rankin Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
