Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lincoln MoodyIn re: Lincoln Moody
as 21-12825
Petitioner:
In re: LINCOLN MOODY, a.k.a. Jose a.k.a. Antonio Espinosa a.k.a. Rateek Allah
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rateek Allah v. Rutledge, et al
as 20-55698
Defendant / Appellee:
LEEN, Asst Health Administrator, VELEHOE, Individual capacity, WOOVINGTON, PA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH
Rateek Allah v. Beasely, et al
as 20-2314
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAFFER, Foodservice Director, WARDEN BEASELY, HOLTZAPPLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH
Rateek Allah v. Martinez, et al
as 20-2313
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT RACKOWSKI, FCC - ALLENWOOD, PAMELA COOK, FCC - ALLENWOOD, CORRECTION OFFICER LEON, FCC - ALLENWOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH
Rateek Allah v. FNU Ramos, et al
as 20-12114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU CHAVIS, FNU DOAKES, FNU RAMOS and others
Rateek Allah v. Palemaros, et al
as 20-11947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH and RATEEK ALLAH, a.k.a. Lincoln Moody, a.k.a. Antonio Espinoza, a.k.a. Jose, a.k.a. Antonio Espinosa
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CARRERO, Case Manager, HUDGINS, Case Manager, FCC Coleman, Florida and others
Rateek Allah v. USA
as 19-14703
Petitioner / Appellant:
RATEEK ALLAH
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Lincoln Moody
as 19-11959
Petitioner:
In re: LINCOLN MOODY, a.k.a. Jose, a.k.a. Antonio Espinosa, a.k.a. Lincoln Moody, a.k.a. Rateek Allah
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rateek Allah v. Doctor Rutledge et al
as 5:2017cv01748
Plaintiff:
Rateek Allah
Defendant:
Ms Leen, Mr Olivares, Dr Rutledge and others
USA v. Lincoln Moody
as 17-13558
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LINCOLN MOODY, a.k.a. Jose, a.k.a. Antonio Espinosa, a.k.a. Lincoln Moody, a.k.a. Rateek Allah
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
