Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Erpelding et al
as 0:2020cv01754
Defendant:
Ray Samson, Daniel Erpelding and Tanshanita Reed
Plaintiff:
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Orange Rabbit, Inc. et al v. Franchoice, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv00687
Plaintiff:
The Orange Rabbit, Inc. and Nicholas Giacopelli
Defendant:
Franchoice, Inc. and Ray Fanning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOL Finance Co. v. Ray et al
as 0:2012cv03059
Plaintiff:
LOL Finance Co.
Defendant:
Michael L. Ray , Border Cattle, LLC , William P. Smith, Jr. and others
Country Inns & Suites by Carlson, Inc. v. Lakeside Motor Lodge of Gainesville, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
Country Inns & Suites by Carlson, Inc.
Defendant:
Lakeside Motor Lodge of Gainesville, Inc. , Ashwin Patel , Ray Thakken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capek v. Melchert et al
as 0:2011cv01868
Plaintiff:
Ray Capek
Defendant:
Jon Melchert and Beard Implement, Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The et al
as 0:2007cv01201
Plaintiff:
Stacey A Smith and Walter N Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The, Prudential Insurance Company of America, The and Dennis Ray
Counter Claimant:
Dennis Ray, Prudential Insurance Company of America, The, Prudential Insurance Company of America, The and others
Counter Defendant:
Stacey A Smith, Walter N Smith, Jr, Stacey A Smith and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Estes Funeral Chapel, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Dennis Ray and Dennis Ray
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The and Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cross Claimant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The, Prudential Insurance Company of America, The and Estes Funeral Chapel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
