Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Tucker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Andrew Raymond Tucker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perez, et al. v. Darling Ingredients, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Mauricia Perez, Angela Cruz, Juan Cruz and others
Defendant:
John Does I - X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roles v. Valley
as 1:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Raymond A Roles
Respondent:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Idaho Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jr Raymond Gomez and Raymond Gomez, Jr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caporaso v. Family Medicine Health Center, et al.
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Donna Caporaso
Defendant:
Family Medicine Health Center, Family Medicine Residency of Idaho, Inc., Family Residency of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Church v. Wasden
as 1:2022cv00001
Petitioner:
Philip Raymond Church
Respondent:
Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney
as 1:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jr Raymond Gomez and Raymond Gomez, Jr
Defendant:
Canyon County Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00584
Plaintiff:
Raymond Rutledge
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Bingham County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Auburn Pharmaceutical, McKesson Corporation, Thrifty Payless, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bingham County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roles v. Christensen et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Rhonda Owens and Jay Christensen
Plaintiff:
Raymond Roles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
