Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Alexander Stewart v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 16-5261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexander E. Stewart
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
William Havens v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 16-5016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Havens
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy; Chairman, Board for Corrections of Naval Records
Michael Crooks v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 15-5212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Crooks
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Dee Mewbourne, Rear ADM, USN, Naval Service Training Command
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walter Jackson, Jr. v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 14-5224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Chairman of the Board For Correction of Naval Records
Ray Leonard, et al v. DOD, et al
as 14-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Father Ray Leonard and Fred Naylor
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Chuck Hagel, United States Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hamdy Abou-Hussein v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 13-5251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hamdy Alex Abou-Hussein
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Navy and Naval Criminal Investigative Services, Unknown Agents
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
