Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ahmad v. Regions Bank et al (TWP1)
as 3:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Fazal Ahmad
Defendant:
Regions Bank and National Western Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tanner v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Schawna Tanner
Defendant:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company , Securian Financial Network, Inc. and Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. McLean et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Timothy A. McLean and Mary C. McLean
Garnishee:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Johnson (PLR2)
as 3:2014cv00537
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Steven E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Universal Properties, Inc. v. Regions Bank
as 3:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
Universal Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Green Hills, LLC v. Regions Bank
as 3:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Green Hills, LLC
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Shops At Lake Havasu City, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Shops At Lake Havasu City, LLC, Wolford Development, Inc. and James L Wolford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Martin
as 3:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Robin Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Glove Factory Land Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank and Regions Bank
Defendant:
Glove Factory Land Holdings, LLC, Glove Factory Land Holdings, LLC, Glove Factory Land Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Regions Bank v. SoFHA Real Estate, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank and Regions Bank
Defendant:
SoFHA Real Estate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
