Cases 1 - 10 of 35
O'TOOLE et al v. ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
as 2:2020cv00592
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LITTLE et al v. ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
as 2:2020cv00591
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and JOSEPH M. LITTLE
Defendant:
ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. PITTSBURGH PRECISION PLUMBING, LLC
as 2:2020cv00330
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH PRECISION PLUMBING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
as 2:2019cv01419
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
LITTLE et al v. ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
as 2:2019cv01420
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and JOSEPH M. LITTLE
Defendant:
ROY C. DEETER PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. RAMSEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 2:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
RAMSEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 2:2019cv00745
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. FAYETTE PLUMBING SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and MARTIN O'TOOLE
Defendant:
FAYETTE PLUMBING SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LITTLE et al v. EATON
as 2:2018cv01672
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and JOSEPH M. LITTLE
Defendant:
THOMAS EATON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
LITTLE et al v. INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION & MECHANICAL, LLC.
as 2:2018cv01053
Plaintiff:
REGIS CLAUS and JOSEPH M. LITTLE
Defendant:
INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION & MECHANICAL, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
