Cases 21 - 30 of 739
Hernandez v. Aranas et al
as 2:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Inginio Hernandez
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Dr. Michael Koehn, Gloria Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams and Michael T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael Minev, R. Donnelly, B. Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Kravetz v. Renee Baker, et al
as 22-15156
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD KRAVETZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and STATE OF NEVADA
Charles Kemp v. B. Egerton, et al
as 21-17012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. KEMP
Defendant / Appellee:
B. EGERTON, R. DONNELLY and POAG
Defendant:
ROMEO ARANAS, DESIREE HURTEN-SCHMIDT, YUP, Dr. and others
Roberto Durand v. Renee Baker
as 21-16725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden
Joseph Anderson v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 21-16549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, IAN E. CARR, K. THOMAS and others
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 3:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Renee Baker, Tara Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Minev et al
as 3:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Michael Minev, R. Donnelly, B. Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alotaibi v. Baker et al
as 2:2021cv01281
Petitioner:
Mazen Alotaibi
Respondent:
Renee Baker, Lovelock Correctional Center and Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Medical Administration Department of Mental Health et al
as 3:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Anthony Edward Martinez, II
Defendant:
Medical Administration Department of Mental Health, Medical Administration Department; Mental Health Department, William G. Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
