Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Benson v. United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis
as 2:2024cv02975
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02958
Respondent:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Criminal Court Division 4, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center and others
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. Alexander
as 2:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Director Anthony C. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Division 4, Criminal Court et al
as 2:2024cv02936
Respondent:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Division 4, Criminal Court, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center and others
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. Fields
as 2:2024cv02908
Defendant:
Kirk Fields
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Benson v. Fields et al
as 2:2024cv02798
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Ofc. Woodard, Sgt. McGhee and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields
as 24-5805
Defendant:
CHIEF JAILER KIRK FIELDS, and Subordinates
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5803
Defendant:
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SHERYL H. LIPMAN
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Rickey Benson v. J. Fields and/or Subordinates, et al
as 24-5790
Defendant:
DEPUTY WRIGHT and J. FIELDS, Chief Jailer and/or subordinates
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields, et al
as 24-5780
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY WRIGHT, in his official capacity, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, in his official capacity., SUPERVISORS OF DEPUTY WRIGHT, in official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
