Cases 1 - 10 of 16
USA v. Davis
as 21-20631
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Davis
Bd Aldermen Twn of Tutwiler MS v. State of MS, Off State Auditor, et al
as 17-60845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF TUTWILER, MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR, James Bobo, BO HOWARD, in his official capacity and ROBERT DAVIS, in his official capacity
USA v. Robert Davi
as 17-20677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 14-10624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS, also known as Clarence Willie-Griffin
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, B. YOUNG, W. DOANE and others
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, et al
as 14-10604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WARDEN FNU WHEELER, WARDEN FNU BETCHER and others
Robert Davis v. Timmy Ducote, et al
as 14-30461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMMY DUCOTE, ANDY BROWN and MARVIN DENTON
Robert Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-10780
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Raphiel Davis v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-60541
Petitioner:
RAPHIEL ROBERT DAVIS, also known as Super Alien Davis, also known as Raphiel Davis
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
