Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robert Sango v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 23-2024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant:
SHERRY L. BURT
Defendant / Appellee:
CAREY BROWN, Lieutenant, JASON BROCK, Correctional Officer and KYLE MAUS, Correctional Officer
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury
as 23-1124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury
as 22-2068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury
as 22-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury
as 22-1881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY
Robert Sango v. Naeyaert, et al
as 22-1874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN JOSEPH M. NAEYAERT, RESIDENTIAL UNIT MANAGER E. HOOVER, PRISONER COUNSELOR LOMAN and others
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury, et al
as 22-1239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TIMOTHY FLEURY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAEL EUBANKS, SERGEANT NESBERG and others
Robert Sango v. Michael Eubanks, et al
as 21-2599
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL EUBANKS, Correctional Officer and TIMOTHY FLEURY, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO and ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Robert Sango v. Michael Eubanks, et al
as 21-2598
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL EUBANKS, Correctional Officer and COLLIN PERRY, Sergeant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO and ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Robert Sango v. Timothy Fleury, et al
as 21-2597
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL EUBANKS, Correctional Officer and TIMOTHY FLEURY, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO and ROBERT DORIAN SANGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
