Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Stephanie C Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00842
Plaintiff:
John Lee Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02618
Plaintiff:
Lamar D. Robinson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
ROBINSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00021
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. ROBINSON , SR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
ROBINSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01591
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. ROBINSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Anna E Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mari Robinson v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARI ROBINSON, on behalf of Sara Robinson, Rebecca Robinson, Elizabeth Robinson, and on behalf of Scott Schramm
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Mari Robinson v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARI ROBINSON, on behalf of Sara Robinson, Rebecca Robinson, Elizabeth Robinson, and on behalf of Scott Schramm
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Robinson v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00584
Plaintiff:
Darrell A Robinson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Robinson v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv04056
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shawn Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
