Cases 71 - 80 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson et al v. American Airlines Inc
as 5:2017cv00426
Plaintiff:
Lynn Robinson and Judith Robinson
Defendant:
American Airlines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Caddo County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Ancio Robinson
Defendant:
Caddo County Board of County Commissioners , Lennis Miller , Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Isaac Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ray v. Rocky Mountain Glass and Tint, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Gary Ray
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Glass and Tint, Inc. , Mark Robinson and Dan Griggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
John Anderson , Rusty Beltinck , Sharon Bryant and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Corporation, Bayer AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mammoth Manufacturing Inc v. C H Robinson Worldwide Inc
as 5:2016cv01009
Plaintiff:
Mammoth Manufacturing Inc
Defendant:
C H Robinson Worldwide Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Caddo County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
Ancio Robinson
Defendant:
Caddo County Board of County Commissioners , Lennis Miller , Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2016cv00869
Plaintiff:
Margie M Robinson
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Chelsey L Gordon, Timothy T Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
