Cases 11 - 20 of 38
OLIVE et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE, VINCENT DALE ROSS and DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON, CLINTON AVERITTE, BARBARA MELYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01874
Plaintiff:
DAVON ROBINSON-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv01707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL ROBINSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, YARBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01229
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DEVON ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBINSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00920
Petitioner:
SCOTT ROBINSON
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and HORVATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MASON et al
as 1:2015cv01196
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
MASON, ROBINSON, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
