Cases 1 - 10 of 745
Rhonda Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 23-2204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA J. GORTON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas D. Gorton II, and in her own right
Defendant / Appellee:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, As Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, AMERICAN REFRACTORIES, TA East Penn Refractories, AO SMITH CORP and others
Defendant:
FOSECO INC, GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO and others
KRAUS et al v. ALCATEL-LUCENT et al
as 2:2018cv02119
Defendant:
SQUARE D COMPANY, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET M. KRAUS and ROBERT J. KRAUS
Petitioner:
RSCC WIRE & CABLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James G. Burney, et al v. A-C Product Liability Trust, et al
as 16-3392
:
In re: NORTHERN OHIO MARITIME ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEBBLES
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. BURNEY and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCONY MOBIL OIL CO., MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
DAMON et al v. AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv01954
Plaintiff:
CALVIN DAMON and ROSEANNE DAMON
Defendant:
AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP., ALCATEL-LUCENT , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. , GTE PRODUCTS OF CONNECTICUT CORPORATION , MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING and others
Cross_defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. , AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP., ALCATEL-LUCENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
DAMON et al v. CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
CALVIN DAMON and ROSEANNE DAMON
Defendant:
CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. , AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP, ALCATEL-LUCENT and others
Cross_claimant:
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING
Cross_defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING , AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP, ALCATEL-LUCENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 14-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARISSA COLLINS, Special Administrator of the Estate of Arthur E. Collins, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
AC & S INC, A corporation, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC, A corporation individually and as successor to Harbison Walker Refractories, Worthington Corp and Pacific Pumps, GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO and others
Defendant:
CSR LTD, A corporation
LENIG v. CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LENIG
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY, INC. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF and others
Cross_claimant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. , GOULDS PUMPS INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , AMCHEM PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KING et al v. ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv06106
Plaintiff:
ROLAND KING and HELEN KING
Defendant:
ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , ARVIN MERITOR and others
Cross_claimant:
ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY and MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING
Cross_defendant:
ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , BECK/ARNLEY WORLDPARTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
