Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Douglas Welsh v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1556
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DEAN WELSH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Earl Handfield, II v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
EARL C. HANDFIELD, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kevin Peno v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PAUL PENO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Obataiya Scott v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYA SCOTT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Sidney Clayton v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1103
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY W. CLAYTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Paul Parks v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-3234
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARKS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-2861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Aaron Bressi v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-2786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Stanley Spriggs v. Superintendent Rockview SCI
as 23-2482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY SPRIGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
