Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25189
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10573
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14550
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46487
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66805
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04062
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19466
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATES et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03217
Plaintiff:
CARL BOURGEOIS, MAURICE BOVEAR, KENNETH BOROM and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Griffis v. Howard et al
as 3:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Doyce Dean Griffis
Defendant:
Marcia Morales Howard, Robert E. O'Neill, D. Rodney Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tisdale v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2007cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alvin Tyrone Tisdale
Defendant:
Scotty Rhoden and D. Rodney Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
