Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Womack v. Cates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03925
Plaintiff: Rodney Jerome Womack
Defendant: B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Womack v. Cates
as 22-884
Petitioner: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Respondent: BRIAN CATES, ACTING WARDEN
Rodney Womack v. W. Gibbons, et al
as 21-16780
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Defendant / Appellee: W. GIBBONS, Sergeant, A. GOMEZ, Correctional Officer, G. OBRIEN, Correctional Officer and others
Rodney Womack v. Gavin Newsom
as 21-15486
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Womack v. Newsom We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00711
Plaintiff: Rodney Jerome Womack
Defendant: Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Womack v. H. Tate, et al
as 20-16325
Defendant / Appellee: H. TATE, Doctor, Z. TAYLOR, Nurse, S. SHIESHA, Chief Medical Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Rodney Womack v. David Baughman, et al
as 20-15853
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, MARQUEZ, Psychologist and LEE, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Rodney Womack v. H. Tate, et al
as 20-15011
Defendant / Appellee: H. TATE, Doctor, Z. TAYLOR, Nurse, S. SHIESHA, Chief Medical Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Rodney Womack v. David Baughman, et al
as 19-16878
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, MARQUEZ, Psychologist and LEE, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
(PC) Womack v. Gibbons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00615
Defendant: G. Obrien, A. Gomez, W. Gibbons and others
Plaintiff: Rooney Jerome Womack and Rodney Jerome Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?