Cases 1 - 6 of 6
John Hale v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 15-60243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ASHLEY HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MIKE HATTEN, Health Service Administrator of Wexford for Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution
John Hale v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 13-60056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MIKE HATTEN, Health Service Administrator of Wexford for Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution
Charles Torns, Jr. v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 09-60610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TORNS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GENEVE BRELAND, Technician for Mississippi Department of Corrections Inmate Legal Assistance Program, LOYD BEASLEY, SMCI Disciplinary Hearing Official and others
Torns v. MS Dept Corrections, et al
as 08-60403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TORNS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GENEVE BRELAND, Technician for Mississippi Department of Corrections Inmate Legal Assistance Program, LOYD BEASLEY, SMCI Disciplinary Hearing Official and others
Jones v. Epps, et al
as 08-60352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD KING, Superintendent and BRENDA SIMS, Captain
Hale v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 07-60997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HALE
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, BINGHAM, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
