Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01076
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, EMORY UNIVERSITY, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ROOTE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00841
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL MAXINE ROOTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2015cv01334
Plaintiff:
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BAILEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOSE A. SANTANA, IKE C. EICHENLAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2013cv00193
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff:
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HILL et al v. WACKENHUT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2011cv02158
Plaintiff:
ADAM HILL , TODD ASHTON HARVILLE , DAVID BOND and others
Defendant:
WACKENHUT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, KELLOG-BROWN & ROOT, LLC and HALLIBURTON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2010cv01947
Plaintiff:
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
