Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hill-Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv03890
Plaintiff:
Rose Mary Hill-Evans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rose Marie Hill v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72990
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Hill
HILL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72991
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE HILL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, QUIGLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HILL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72992
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE HILL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, QUIGLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HILL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72993
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE HILL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, QUIGLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HILL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72994
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE HILL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, QUIGLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HILL v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72990
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE HILL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, QUIGLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HART et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63023
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HART, ROSE MARIE HILL, KATHLEEN KING and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, QUIGLEY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
