Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Rivas v. Melecio
as 2:2023cv05718
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Respondent:
Phil Melecio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Ellis v. Daniel Nieto DBA 3D Trucking et al
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Ellis
Defendant:
Daniel Nieto DBA 3D Trucking and Rudy Sauceda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Second A-One, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Second A-One, Inc., Isack David Weisz, La Jarabacoa Deli and Grocery Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Charlton et al v. Premier Lawn & Landscape Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06055
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charlton and Rudy Lalgee
Defendant:
Premier Lawn & Landscape Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rivas v. Miller
as 2:2022cv03514
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivas v. Miller
as 2:2021cv07041
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zelaya Ayala et al v. Gold Coast Detailing Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv06101
Plaintiff:
Sergio Danilo Zelaya Ayala, Carlos Rodriguez, Lorenzo Romero Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Gold Coast Detailing Inc. and James Belmonte
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
