Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Viens v. Makin et al
as 2:2020cv00721
Defendant:
FNU Austin, FNU Crockett, FNU Olsen and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Viens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spight et al v. Cook Group et al
as 2:2020cv00609
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Medical, Cook Group and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Spight and Rudy Apalategui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LHF Productions v. Helquist et al.
as 2:2019cv00371
Defendant:
Internet Subscribers 1-8, Rudy Bernal, Morgan Shimer and others
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Romero v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2018cv00003
Petitioner:
Rudy M. Romero
Respondent:
State of Utah, Shane Nelson and Utah Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. USA
as 1:2016cv00069
Petitioner:
Rudy Enrique Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Helo Energy et al v. Hoggan et al
as 1:2016mc00016
Plaintiff:
Helo Energy , Sand Canyon of Tehachapi and Saugatuck Energy
Defendant:
Jefrey Hoggan , Kent A. Hoggan , Heather K. Kann and others
Cross_defendant:
RAR Energy Consulting, Fishcreek Capital Funding, Rudy Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Bacon v. Bautista et al
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Rudy Bautista and Tyson V. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Arkansas Best Freight et al
as 2:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
Dale Wright
Defendant:
Arkansas Best Freight , ABF Freight System, Inc. and Rudy Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Trujillo v. Winder
as 2:2012cv00728
Petitioner:
Ruben Rudy Trujillo
Respondent:
James M. Winder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trujillo v. Herbert et al
as 2:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ruben Rudy Trujillo
Defendant:
Gary Herbert, James M. Winder and Mark Ellsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
