Cases 1 - 10 of 31
RUIZ v. MILLER et al
as 2:2023cv20633
Plaintiff:
ERID RUIZ
Defendant:
AARON MILLER, JUDGE JAMES SATTELY, ANDREA VILLARROEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUIZ v. THE STATE NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv16086
Plaintiff:
ERID RUIZ
Defendant:
THE STATE NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NEW JERSEY D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUIZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv03679
Petitioner:
RAMON RUIZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOPERA v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BD. et al
as 1:2022cv04361
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN LOPERA
Defendant:
N.J. STATE PAROLE BD., SATURNINO RUIZ and JAMES GAHM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIORDANO v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv20482
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONRAD v. LOPEZ DE LASALLE et al
as 1:2021cv08462
Plaintiff:
DAVID CONRAD
Defendant:
JOSE R. RUIZ, DIANE SOMMER, MS. HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING v. SERGEANT LIBERTY et al
as 1:2021cv08282
Defendant:
OFFICER REED, OFFICER XAYAPHACHAN, OFFICER TRAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADELBERT A. WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIORDANO v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2020cv18432
Defendant:
J. EVERETT, R. RAHNER, A. PACIULLI and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USHERY v. KIRBY et al
as 1:2018cv14431
Defendant:
L. KLEKOS, JOHN DOE, S. LIMBEKAR and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. USHERY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARVEY v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE et al
as 1:2017cv04648
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D HARVEY
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MATTHEW MASSING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
