Other Statutes Cases
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nocella et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv01051
Defendant: Anthony J Nocella and J Russell McCann
Plaintiff: Securities And Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Harold Roucher Trust U/A, et al v. Franklin Bank Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-20291
Movant - Appellant: FRANKLIN LEAD PLAINTIFF GROUP
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD ROUCHER TRUST U/A DTD 09/21/72, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Lead Plaintiff for the Preferred Stock Purchaser Class, PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and JOSEPH PRIBYL
Defendant - Appellee: ANTHONY J. NOCELLA, RUSSELL MCCANN, LEWIS S. RANIERI and others
United States of America v. McCann
as 1:2009mc00260
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Russell McCann
The Harold Roucher Trust U/A DTD 09/21/72 v. RBC Capital Markets Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv01348
Plaintiff: The Harold Roucher Trust U/A DTD 09/21/72
Defendant: RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Anthony J Nocella, Russell McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Buccieri v. Franklin Bank Corp. et al
as 4:2008cv01891
Plaintiff: Charles F. Buccieri and Charles F. Buccieri
Defendant: Franklin Bank Corp., Anthony J Nocella and Russell McCann
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: Franklin Bank Corp. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv01810
Plaintiff: The Harold Roucher Trust U/A DTD 09/21/72 and The Harold Roucher Trust U/A DTD 09/21/72
Defendant: Franklin Bank Corp., Anthony J Nocella and Russell McCann
Consol Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan, Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan, Charles F. Buccieri and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?