Cases 1 - 10 of 17
S.D., et al. v. Reese, et al.
as 26-4872
Plaintiff:
S.D., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and J.F.
Defendant:
MIKE REESE, RYAN LEGORE, JOHN DOES, 1-5 and others
Hornsby v. LeGore et al
as 2:2026cv01512
Plaintiff:
Glen Alen Hornsby
Defendant:
Ryan LeGore, C. Juarez-Ramirez and E. Ingersol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochell v. LeGore
as 2:2026cv01029
Petitioner:
Wade Anthony Cochell
Respondent:
Ryan LeGore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. LeGore, et al.
as 26-3010
Plaintiff:
CRUZ PALACIOS ROMERO
Defendant:
RYAN LEGORE, Superintendent, PATRICK MANEY, Provedor, THOMAS BRISTOL, Provedor and others
Romero v. LeGore, et al.
as 26-2811
Plaintiff:
CRUZ PALACIOS ROMERO
Defendant:
RYAN LEGORE, Superintendent, PATRICK MANEY, Provider, THOMAS BRISTOL, Provider and others
Wentworth v. LeGore
as 2:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
David Jaafe Wentworth
Defendant:
Ryan LeGore, B. Kennedy and J. Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Oregon Department of Correction et al
as 2:2026cv00036
Plaintiff:
Justin Aaron Holt
Defendant:
Cpl. Booher, Cpl. T. Hancock, Officer C. Matson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palacios-Romero v. LeGore et al
as 2:2025cv02449
Plaintiff:
Cruz Palacios Romero
Defendant:
Ryan LeGore, Patrick Maney, Thomas Bristol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanco v. LeGore et al
as 2:2025cv02432
Plaintiff:
Marcos Joseph Blanco
Defendant:
Ryan LeGore, Ms. Petterson and Jason Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2025cv02144
Plaintiff:
Herman Kenneth Reed
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Ryan LeGore, Herron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
