Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schenck v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv02348
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ryker William Schenck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
In re: Ryker Schenck v. Marin County Superior Court
as 13-72196
:
In re: RYKER WILLIAM SCHENCK
Petitioner:
RYKER WILLIAM SCHENCK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ryker Schenck v. R. Spearman
as 13-15801
Petitioner - Appellant:
RYKER WILLIAM SCHENCK
Respondent - Appellee:
R. E. SPEARMAN
Ryker Schenck v. People of the United State
as 13-15800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYKER WILLIAM SCHENCK
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES
Schenck v. Spearman
as 4:2013cv00384
Petitioner:
Ryker William Schenck
Respondent:
R. E. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schenck v. People of the United States
as 4:2012cv06396
Plaintiff:
Ryker William Schenck
Defendant:
People of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv04422
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ryker Schenck v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 11-18018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYKER WILLIAM SCHENCK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, II, Governor, State of California, RANDOLPH HEUBACH and VERNA ADAMS, Judge
Ryker Schenck v. The People of the State of Cal, et al
as 11-73174
Petitioner:
RYKER WILLIAM SCHENCK
Respondent:
MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and JERRY BROWN, Governor of California
Schenck v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv02502
Plaintiff:
Ryker William Schenck
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Marin Superior Court, Randolph Heubach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
