Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RAM v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
AATMA RAM
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE and DEPARTMENT OF STATE WAIVER REVIEW DIVISION OF BUREAU OF CONSULAR AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
CHEN v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2019cv03652
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff:
RAM CHEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SIMON et al v. REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY et al
as 1:2010cv01770
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE SIMON , HELEN HERMAN , CHARLOTTE WEISS and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, MAGYAR ALLAMVASUTAK ZRT. and RAIL CARGO HUNGARIA ZRT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
RAM v. USA
as 1:2007cv01405
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MOORTHY SRINIVASAN RAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
