Cases 1 - 10 of 11
OATMAN v. COLLIER et al
as 1:2022cv03678
Plaintiff:
BRIAN G. OATMAN
Defendant:
MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORPORATION, A OR K RODRIGUEZ, B. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00709
Petitioner:
EDBIN RAMIREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Olivio Ramirez v. USA
as 13-5189
Petitioner - Appellant:
Juan Carlos Olivo Ramirez
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
RAMIREZ v. ARPAIO et al
as 1:2013cv00965
Plaintiff:
REYNALDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, JOHN ANDRES, PAUL MEINTEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVIO RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00901
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS OLIVIO RAMIREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMIREZ v. ARPAIO et al
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
REYNALDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, STATE OF ARIZONA, ENRIQUEZ GERARDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVO RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00513
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS OLIVO RAMIREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jesse Ramirez v. DOJ, et al
as 10-5016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesse Ramirez
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, McGehee, Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
