Cases 11 - 20 of 4,717
Coleman v. City of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 24-2939
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH LEPORE, CHERYL HOOTEN and others
Godinez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-2788
Petitioner:
ANABEL GODINEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santamaria-Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2700
Petitioner:
MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA-RAMIREZ and ERICK ADOLFO LEIVA-SANTAMARIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramirez-Salas De Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2671
Petitioner:
DENIA MERCI RAMIREZ-SALAS DE MARTINEZ, YASMIN CAMILA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ and LEANDRO OMAR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Enedina Ramirez-Lopez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11249
Petitioner:
ENEDINA LISET RAMIREZ-LOPEZ and KIMBERLY MAYDALY CHAVEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2609
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ, IAN EMMANUEL CERRITOS LOPEZ and CHRISTOPHER ALONSO CERRITOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
United States v. Pedro Ramirez
as 24-1830
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Ramirez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
