Cases 31 - 38 of 38
RAMOS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
LAURA J. RAMOS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RAMOS v. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2012cv00481
Plaintiff:
JULIO A. RAMOS
Defendant:
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. FOXHALL ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 1:2011cv01581
Plaintiff:
JOSE ISMAEL RAMOS
Defendant:
FOXHALL ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TRUSTEES OF THE ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 26 PENSION TRUST FUND et al v. TRUST FUND ADVISORS, INC. et al
as 1:2003cv02662
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. HELLER , RONALD BRYANT , JAMES CRAFT and others
Defendant:
TRUST FUND ADVISORS, INC. , ALLIANZ AG and NICHOLAS APPLEGATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
TOOLASPRASHAD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00317
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AZAMAR et al v. STERN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01052
Plaintiff:
SILVERIO AZAMAR, DANY FRANCISCO RAMOS AGUILAR and ROSA MIRIAM MESIA GUEVARA
Defendant:
STERN ENTERPRISES, INC. and LEON C. STERN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAMOS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv00895
Plaintiff:
RAUL CASTILLO RAMOS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CANNON v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2007cv00819
Defendant:
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, RONALD M. GEORGE, MARCIA M. TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
TYRRALL FARROW CANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
