Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ramos v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Multnomah County Inverness Jail
Plaintiff:
Colby Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. State of Oregon
as 3:2018cv00339
Petitioner:
Colby Ramos
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stay Frosty Enterprises LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00283
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Coastal Advertising Specialties Inc., Empire Design and Insignia and others
Plaintiff:
Stay Frosty Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Isela M. Ramos
as 3:2018ad00010
In Re:
Isela M. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Ramos et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01628
Defendant:
Amy Atchison, Lt. Bael, Officer Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Ramos and Ramon Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01472
Defendant:
And other to be named at a later time., Amy Atchison, Lt. Bael and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin and Ramon Ramos
OSCI:
Officer Box
BHS:
Ms. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Lopez v. USA
as 1:2016cv01325
Petitioner:
Sergio Ramos-Lopez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Secretary of Labor v. Stars Cleaning, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01127
Defendant:
Estela Ramos and Stars Cleaning, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
