Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wilhelm v. Mackinac Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv11498
Defendant:
Randolph C. Paschke, David R. Steinhardt, Martin A. Thomson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Ryan v. Mackinac Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv11453
Defendant:
Randolph C. Paschke, Kelly W. George, David R. Steinhardt and others
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv12146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Randolph
as 2:2017mj30405
Defendant:
Richard Randolph
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Randolph
as 2:2017mj30405
Defendant:
Richard Randolph
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
209 Jax Owner, LLC et al v. Preferred Building Services, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv12242
Plaintiff:
209 Jax Owner, LLC , Monroe Acquisition, LLC , Bell Acquisition, LLC and others
Defendant:
Preferred Building Services, LLC, David Lautenbach and Arif Sulejmanovska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hollins et al v. The Janitorial Agency Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00745
Plaintiff:
Walter Hollins , Kemondie Patterson and Rosa Pizzo
Defendant:
The Janitorial Agency Corp., The Janitorial Agency Franchise Systems Corp., The Janitorial Agency Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Trager
as 2:2011mj30602
Defendant:
Randolph Trager
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
