Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Page v. Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Danell Page
Defendant:
Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc., Randstad Inhouse Services, LLC and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clarence Bell, III v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01358
Defendant:
Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Randstad Inhouse Services, LLC and CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clarence C. Bell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clarence Bell, III v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Randstad Inhouse Services, LLC, Does 1 to 100, inclusive and CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clarence C. Bell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pope et al v. Randstad Inhouse Services LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mark Pope and Jamal Rice
Defendant:
Spherion Staffing, LLC, Randstad Inhouse Services LLC and Randstad North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
