Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Herring v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Cedric Oneal Herring
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Randy Akies, Corporal Hight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmonds v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Norman Simmonds
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Deputy Randy Akies, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv05054
Plaintiff:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, Randy Akies, Cpt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04679
Petitioner:
Xavier Cato
Respondent:
Randy Akies, Melody M. Maddox and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04508
Plaintiff:
De'Onte Miller
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Randy Akies, Sgt. Friday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingo v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04411
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Wingo
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox and Randy Akies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04412
Plaintiff:
Omar Holder
Defendant:
Randy Akies, Melody M. Maddox, Officer Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04157
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cato
Defendant:
Randy Akies and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore-Earvin v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv03438
Plaintiff:
William Moore-Earvin
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox and Randy Akies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv03202
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Randy Akies and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
