Cases 1 - 10 of 212
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Raymond Lewis
as 24-1751
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raymond Antonio Lewis
United States v. Travis Raymond
as 24-1278
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Travis Ryan Raymond
United States v. Michael Holst
as 23-3217
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Raymond Holst
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund et al v. IES, LLC et al
as 0:2023mc00094
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund, National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Fund, National Elevator Industry Educational Fund and others
Defendant:
IES, LLC, Wolfe Clark and Raymond Kuntz
Trustees of the Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan et al v. IES, LLP et al
as 0:2023mc00091
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan, Trustees of the Elevator Industry Work Preservation Fund and Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund, Health Benefit Plan, and Educational Plan
Defendant:
IES, LLP and Raymond Kuntz
United States v. Raymond March
as 23-1279
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raymond Lee March
Trudale Williams v. United States
as 22-3374
Petitioner:
Trudale Raymond Williams, also known as Trudy
Respondent:
United States of America
Roger Raymond v. Mark Vargo, Atty General, et al
as 22-2913
Petitioner:
Roger Allen Raymond
Respondent:
Mark Vargo, Attorney General of South Dakota and Darin Young, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
Raymond Williams v. United States
as 22-2245
Petitioner:
Raymond Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
