Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rayvon Boatman v. Department of Children and Fa, et al
as 16-15564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, contracting with Correct Care Recovery Solutions, FLORIDA CIVIL COMMITMENT CENTER, DONALD SAWYER and others
Gering v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gering
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedroza v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
Pedro Pedroza
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Kenyata Brown
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowley v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jose Cowley
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosler v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hosler
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckenrode v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Eckenrode, Jr.
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cooper
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaffer v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Thomas Schaffer
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
