Cases 1 - 10 of 26
United Cook Inlet Drift Ass'n, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 20-35029
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA M. BLANK, in her official capacity as Acting United States Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, JANE LUBCHENCO, in her offical capacity as Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED COOK INLET DRIFT ASSOCIATION and COOK INLET FISHERMEN'S FUND
Inst for Marine Mammal Studies v. Natl Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 14-60868
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INSTITUTE FOR MARINE MAMMAL STUDIES
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and REBECCA M. BLANK, Acting Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce
Michael McDermott v. Rebecca Blank, et al
as 14-35022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GROVES, Former Secretary of Commerce, U.S. Department of Commerce - U.S. Census Bureau, REBECCA M. BLANK, Acting Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Department of Commerce, CATHERINE H ANDERSON, Deputy Director for Decennial Ops., Office of Civil Rights - Department of Commerce and others
Turtle Island Restoration Netw, et al v. DOC, et al
as 13-17123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, REBECCA M. BLANK, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
HAWAII LONGLINE ASSOCIATION
Oceana, Inc. v. Rebecca Blank, et al
as 13-16183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OCEANA, INC., an non-profit organization
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA M. BLANK, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA WETFISH PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, CITY OF MONTEREY, MONTEREY FISH COMPANY and others
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION v. BLANK et al
as 1:2013cv00820
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION
Defendant:
REBECCA M. BLANK , NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION v. BLANK et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION
Defendant:
REBECCA M. BLANK , NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
Alaska Oil and Gas Association v. Blank et al
as 4:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Alaska Oil and Gas Association
Defendant:
Rebecca M. Blank and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Michael McDermott v. Rebecca Blank, et al
as 13-35440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA M. BLANK, Acting Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Department of Commerce, ROBERT GROVES, Former Secretary of Commerce, U.S. Department of Commerce - U.S. Census Bureau, CATHERINE H ANDERSON, Deputy Director for Decennial Ops., Office of Civil Rights - Department of Commerce and others
The Humane Society of the Unit, et al v. Rebecca Blank, et al
as 13-35195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, BETHANIE O'DRISCOLL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA M. BLANK, Acting Secretary of Commerce, SAMUEL D RAUCH, III, Acting Assistant Administrator for NOAA Fisheries and HELEN GOLDE, Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, NOAA Fisheries
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, by and through its Department of Fish and Wildlife, STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Fish and Wildlife and STATE OF IDAHO, by and through its Department of Fish and Wildlife
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
