Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00348
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01905
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00549
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mihalcik et al v. Commercial Recovery Systems Inc
as 2:2013cv00194
Plaintiff: Michael Mihalcik and Sue Mihalcik
Defendant: Commercial Recovery Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VICIAN v. CAPITAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2013cv00846
Defendant: CAPITAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS VICIAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00515
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rosary v. States Recovery Systems Inc
as 2:2012cv00354
Plaintiff: Lisa Rosary
Defendant: States Recovery Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00445
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ADAMS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv01623
Plaintiff: JANET P. ADAMS and JANET P. ADAMS
Defendant: CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
SLS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. UTILITY RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2008cv01617
Plaintiff: SLS MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant: UTILITY RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?