Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al.
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
McCabe, Sr. et al v. Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv62148
Plaintiff:
John R. McCabe, Sr. and Rita A. McCabe
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc., BASF Catalysts LLC, The Boeing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
David Crooks
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ortman v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
David Ortman
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Wohlfert v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Wohlfert
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
