Cases filed in Indiana
Jent v. Biomedical Tissue Services Ltd et al
as 1:2008cv00012
Plaintiff: Brad Jent
Defendant: Biomedical Tissue Services Ltd, Regeneration Technologies Inc, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
POGUE et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES et al
as 4:2007cv00147
Plaintiff: JAMES POGUE and MARGARET POGUE
Defendant: BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ATHERTON et al v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01211
Plaintiff: CHARLES ATHERTON, CATHERINE HALE, BARBARA PETERSON and others
Defendant: REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. and BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawkins-Austin et al v. Regeneration Technologies Inc et al
as 1:2007cv00242
Plaintiff: Cheryl Hawkins-Austin, Cheryl Hawkins-Austin, Jody McDonald and others
Defendant: Regeneration Technologies Inc, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and Biomedical Tissue Services LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARDING et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES et al
as 1:2007cv00538
Plaintiff: ED HARDING and DEBRA HARDING
Defendant: BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?