Cases 1 - 7 of 7
RampWerks, LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. (d/b/a REI)
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
RampWerks, LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc. (d/b/a REI)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Original Lulac Council No. 2, Inc. v. Rey Feo Scholarship Foundation, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Original Lulac Council No. 2, Inc.
Defendant:
Rey Feo Scholarship Foundation, Inc., John D. Gabriel, Sr. and Johnny Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rey Feo Scholarship v. LULAC Council No. 2
as 5:2022cv01077
Counter Defendant:
Rey Feo Scholarship Foundation
Defendant:
Original LULAC Council No. 2 and LULAC Council No. 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strand Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Artec Integrated, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
Strand Systems Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
Artec Integrated, LLC, Jordan M. Rey and Artec Integrated, LLC doing business as Artec Engineering
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Casadomaine Homebuilders, LLC v. Mark A. Robertson, et al
as 5:2018cv00593
Counter Defendant:
Casadomaine Homebuilders, LLC
Plaintiff:
Casadomaine Homebuilders, LLC
Counter Plaintiff:
JB REI, LLC
Defendant:
JB REI, LLC, JES Enterprises, Inc., Mark A. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Genaville LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. (d/b/a REI)
as 2:2015cv00888
Plaintiff:
Genaville LLC
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment, Inc. (d/b/a REI)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Changzhou Asian Endergonic Electronic Technology Co. Ltd. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Changzhou Asian Endergonic Electronic Technology Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Best Buy Co., Inc., Bracketron, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
