Cases
Daniel Cavic v. Republic of Montenegro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv01308
Plaintiff: Daniel Cavic
Defendant: Republic of Montenegro, Republic of Serbia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daniel Cavic v. Republic of Montenegro et al
as 8:2023mc00010
Plaintiff: Daniel Cavic
Defendant: Serbia Republic of, Montenegro Republic of, North Macedonia Republic of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant: European Community, acting on its on behalf and on behalf of the Member States it has power to represent, Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Finland and others
Defendant - Appellee: RJR Nabisco, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc. and others
The Bank of New York v. Yugoimport et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1990
Plaintiff: The Bank of New York
Defendant - Appellee: Republic of Croatia and Republic of Slovenia
Defendant - Appellant: Yugoimport
The Bank of New York v. Yugoimport, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv09055
Plaintiff: The Bank of New York
Defendant: Yugoimport , Republic of Croatia and Republic of Slovenia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
European Community et al v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv05771
Plaintiff: Czech Republic, European Community, Federal Republic of Germany and others
Defendant: Nabisco Group Holdings Corp., R.J. Reynolds Global Products, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Unknown: C. Stephen Heard and Brendan J. LeMoult
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?