Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RESTO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17395
Plaintiff:
BRUMILDA RESTO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RESTO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09212
Plaintiff:
BRUMILDA RESTO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPRUILL v. FEMA DRY CLEANING SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00139
Defendant:
FEMA DRY CLEANING SERVICES, LLC, MARGARITA RESTO and FELICIA MELLONI
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SPRUILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS v. URBINO et al
as 2:2016cv02593
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS
Defendant:
MARY URBINO and PAL INASAL RESTO GRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RESTO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv03253
Petitioner:
ALLEN RESTO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SYNERGY HEALTHCARE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. SCIBILIA et al
as 2:2011cv05679
Plaintiff:
SYNERGY HEALTHCARE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , SYNERGY PUBLISHING GROUP, INC. and SYNERGY MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PHILIP SCIBILIA, ANDREW SCIBILIA, JOHN ZITEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
