Cases 21 - 30 of 37
BULLARD v. RETRIEVAL-MASTER CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
AMBER BULLARD
Defendant:
RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Young v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
Milagros Young
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUTCHINS v. RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
MELISSA HUTCHINS
Defendant:
RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RIGG v. RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2014cv00152
Defendant:
RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Plaintiff:
DANA LOUISE RIGG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Holt v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08062
Plaintiff:
Michelle Holt
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and Russell Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
