Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ahmadi v. Lumpkin
as 22-20295
Petitioner / Appellant:
Reza Ahmadi
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ahmadi v. Lumpkin
as 21-20341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reza Ahmadi
Defendant / Appellee:
David G. Gutierrez, CHAIR, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Charley Valdez, Program Supervisor III Classification and Records, TDCJ-ID
Reza Ahmadi v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 19-20811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REZA AHMADI
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID G. GUTIERREZ, CHAIR, LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and CHARLEY VALDEZ, Program Supervisor III Classification and Records, TDCJ-ID
Reza Ahmadi v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 19-20793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REZA AHMADI
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID G. GUTIERREZ, Chair, DENISE WILLIAMS, Program Supervisor, III and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Reza Ahmadi v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20598
Petitioner / Appellant:
REZA AHMADI
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Reza Ahmadi, et al v. Glenvest, L.L.C.
as 17-20359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REZA AHMADI and TERESA AHMADI
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENVEST, L.L.C.
Reza Ahmadi v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 17-20052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REZA AHMADI
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and STATE OF TEXAS BOARD PARDONS AND PAROLES
Reza Ahmadi v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41334
Petitioner - Appellant:
REZA AHMADI
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
