Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Tharayil v. Lorberbaum et al
as 4:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Karen A. Smith Bogart, Filip Balcaen, William H. Runge, III and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Tharayil
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Central Laborers Pension Fund, Teamsters Local 456 Annuity Fund and Teamsters Local 456 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Lorberbaum et al
as 4:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Filip Balcaen, Karen A. Bogart Smith, Glenn R. Landau and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Love , Tinna Dobbs Beebout , Beth Amelia Beebout and others
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MOOREHOUSE v. COLVIN
as 5:2016cv00455
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C MOOREHOUSE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. Rite Aid Pharmacy
as 1:2014cv03746
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Huff
Defendant:
Rite Aid Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Polk County, Baldwin County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
