Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Smith v. Police Officer Clayton et al
as 6:2017cv01150
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Police Officer Clayton, Police Officer Simons, Kiesha Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Deputy L.T. Stokes et al
as 6:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Deputy L.T. Stokes, Deputy, Wayne Ivory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ivory et al
as 6:2017cv01072
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Wayne Ivory, Medical & Mental Health Administrations, Inmates Law Librarian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pratt et al
as 6:2017cv01055
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Kiesha Pratt, Larry Simpson, Jr., Larry Simpson, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pratt et al
as 6:2017cv01012
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Kiesha Pratt, Fox Lamb 1, Fox Lamb 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brevard County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00631
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail, Law Librarian and Armor Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ivory et al
as 6:2017cv01003
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Wayne Ivory, Corporal Fire Bird, 4 John Doe OIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Reception and Medical Center et al
as 3:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Reception and Medical Center and Olahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State Attorney et al
as 6:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
State Attorney, Andrew Reed, Charles Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Police Officer Clayton et al
as 6:2017cv00961
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Police Officer Clayton, Officer Simons, Police Officer Ms. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
