Cases 41 - 50 of 239
Teresa Richardson, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 20-5367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Christopher Carroll, Teresa Richardson, Aida Zargas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ARRIAGADA STUVEN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv02937
Defendant:
GREGORY A. RICHARDSON, USCIS, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramon Arriagada Stuven
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
ZALESHCHUK et al v. HOLT
as 1:2020cv02938
Plaintiff:
Danil Zaleshchuk, Alexander Vladimirovich Zaleshchuk, Olga Papurina and others
Defendant:
Catherine Holt, GREGORY RICHARDSON and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
