Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00345
Petitioner:
Michael Terrell Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Anthony Donte Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richardson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dean Naylor, C.J. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Silas Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dean Naylor, C.J. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Silas Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LaBelle v. Bandy et al
as 4:2020cv00146
Plaintiff:
Raymond LaBelle
Defendant:
Cassie Hindman, Bandy, John Mays and others
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik and William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. Hagler et al
as 4:2019cv00367
Defendant:
Lance Perry, Len Hagler, Bryan Earls and others
Plaintiff:
Rayford Pryor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Nix et al
as 4:2016cv00457
Plaintiff:
Joshua Steven Richardson
Defendant:
Gail Nix, Kathy Eschen, Greg Ort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00238
Petitioner:
Andrew James Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00228
Petitioner:
Andrew James Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rush-Richardson v. USA
as 4:2012cv00462
Petitioner:
Ontario Rush-Richardson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
